NHTSA Seeks Accountability, Transparency on ADAS-Related Crashes
A new order mandates major manufacturers, Tier 1 suppliers, and operators of autonomous vehicles to report crashes of vehicles equipped with emerging in-vehicle technologies.

An August 2020 report from AAA found that over the course of 4,000 miles of real-world driving, vehicles equipped with active driving assistance systems experienced a system anomaly every eight miles, on average.
Photo courtesy of AAA.
Entities as diverse as General Motors, Tesla, Lyft, Navistar, BorgWarner, Denso, First Transit, and Nuro will soon begin reporting crashes of their vehicles equipped with advanced driver assistance systems.
On June 29, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration issued an order requiring major vehicle and equipment manufacturers and operators of vehicles equipped with SAE Level 2 advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) or SAE Levels 3-5 automated driving systems (ADS) to report crashes during which those systems were engaged.
The action is designed to enable NHTSA to collect and analyze crash data to identify safety issues that could emerge in these automated systems, the agency said in a statement.
NHTSA’s order requires those entities, including software manufacturers, to report crashes that occur on public roads in the U.S. The order does not cover individual fleet operators. It mandates reporting within one day of learning of a crash that involves a hospital-treated injury, fatality, vehicle tow-away, airbag deployment, or a “vulnerable road user” such as a pedestrian or bicyclist.
Every month, those entities must report all other crashes involving an ADAS-equipped vehicle that involve an injury or property damage. Those reports must be updated monthly with new or additional information. The reports must be submitted to NHTSA electronically through a form that NHTSA will use to collate the information and identify crashes for follow up.
Failure to respond could result in civil penalties of up to $22,992 per violation per day, up to a maximum penalty of more than $114 million.
Initially, the vast majority of reporting will come from major automakers with vehicles equipped with Level 2 ADAS, which includes commonly available driver-assist functions such as lane centering assistance and adaptive cruise control.
The order also includes autonomous technology providers that operate ADS-equipped vehicles at Level 4 autonomy — such as Nuro, Gatik AI, Kodiak Robotics, Cruise, and Poni.AI — though those vehicles are not currently sold to consumers and are in limited testing presently.
NHTSA’s order follows mounting reports of problems with ADAS-equipped vehicles as well as crashes.
An August 2020 report from AAA found that over the course of 4,000 miles of real-world driving, vehicles equipped with active driving assistance systems experienced a system anomaly every 8 miles, on average. Problems included trouble with the systems keeping the test vehicles in their lane, coming too close to other vehicles or guardrails, and active driving assistance systems disengaging with little notice.
Tesla has experienced an ongoing string of incidents with crashes involving its AutoPilot system. At least three Tesla drivers have died while Autopilot was engaged. Problems with Tesla’s AutoPilot system may not be increasing, however. Tesla released crash data regarding AutoPilot crashes in the first half of last year, which showed an overall improving per-mile trend in incidences.
Originally posted on Automotive Fleet
More Safety

When Work Trucks Under 26,001 Pounds Need IRP Registration
Think trucks under 26,001 pounds are automatically in the clear when it comes to IRP? Not always. Learn where lighter vehicles can still run into trip permit, apportioned registration, and IFTA compliance requirements when crossing state or provincial lines.
Read More →
Volvo Trucks Releases New Safety Recommendations for Traveling with Pets
One of the most important recommendations for professional drivers traveling with pets is to ensure pets are properly restrained while the truck is moving. Other tips are available in the new guide from Volvo Trucks North America and Center for Pet Safety.
Read More →
API Issues Refueling Safety Guidelines
The American Petroleum Institute offers a list of safe vehicle refueling guidelines, including ways to avoid potential problems with static electricity discharges in fall, winter, and early spring.
Read More →
Winter Fleet Prep: Expert Tips to Keep Vehicles Running Smoothly
Cold weather can expose weak batteries, tires, fuel systems, and maintenance gaps fast. Use this winter fleet checklist to prepare trucks and drivers before temperatures drop.
Read More →
When a Work Truck Breaks Down, the Job Can Stop, Too
A work truck breakdown can stop more than the vehicle. Discover how payloads, jobsites, and specialty equipment change the roadside response.
Read More →
What Stronger Long-Term Fleet Service Partnerships Actually Require
Fleet service partnerships rarely fall apart all at once. Learn the three warning signs that trust is eroding and what fleets and providers can do before downtime, frustration, and lost revenue follow.
Read More →
Applause & TRUCE Software Partner to Improve Driver Safety Through AI-Powered Telematics & Employee Performance Management
Applause has integrated TRUCE driving metrics directly into its employee-first performance and safety platform that transforms mobile devices into AI-powered telematics.
Read More →
How Detroit Assurance with Active Brake Assist Works
Do you want to see what it is like to experience Detroit Assurance’s Active Brake Assist? In this video, Work Truck will put you in the cab to see how it all works and then hear more details from DTNA’s Mike Young.
Read More →
Get Left of Loss: A 5-Step Workplace Violence Prevention Framework for Fleet Operators
Violence risks do not stop at the driver’s door. Learn five practical steps fleets can take to spot threats early and protect workers before loss occurs.
Read More →How Better Visibility Cut Speeding Violations by 48%
Fleet leaders don't need more data, they need clearer visibility into what the data is saying. This case study explores how one utility replaced speeding-event counts with a single metric — miles driven in violation — to strengthen safety and significantly reduce speeding violations.
Read More →
