MAGAZINE

November 2008, Work Truck - Feature

Pros & Cons: Aluminum vs. FRP Van Bodies

By Sean Lyden

ARTICLE TOOLS        | E-MailPrint RSS

 

Which sidewall material is best for your van body trucks — aluminum or fiberglass reinforced plywood (FRP)? Here are six points of comparison to help weigh the pros and cons.

1. Initial Cost

The price difference ranges from $400-$1,200 or more depending on body size and manufacturer with the advantage going to aluminum. Additionally, aluminum is more economical for nonwhite exterior colors because aluminum sheets are available in a variety of standard pre-painted colors. FRP comes standard only in white, requiring extra cost for either a colored gel coat or paint to create color panels.

One trend to watch, however, is the rise in material costs. "In recent years, the escalating cost of aluminum has significantly narrowed the gap in the cost of FRP versus aluminum bodies, resulting in FRP now being only a slight premium to aluminum," says Bob Besse, director of marketing and product planning for Supreme Corp., a nationwide manufacturer of aluminum and FRP van and cutaway bodies.

2. Weight

Aluminum is approximately 8-10 percent lighter than FRP. Take, for example, a base 14-foot van body (84 inches high; 96 inches wide) built by Supreme Corp. The aluminum body weighs 2,150 lbs., the FRP 2,328 lbs. In this case, the aluminum body offers just 200 lbs. less additional payload capacity than the FRP. Consult your body manufacturer for precise weight figures for the body size and options you’re considering.

3. Appearance

The advantage here goes to FRP, which offers a seamless, clean, bright and smooth surface for eye-catching graphics and lettering. With aluminum, you must work around seams and rivets, which may diminish appearance.

4. Durability

"FRP is composed of four layers — a plywood core, woven fiberglass roving, white pigment resin, and gel coat — that are formed together under intense heat and pressure," Besse explains. "This makes FRP a sturdier and more durable wall construction than aluminum, holding up best against interior cargo and road damage, dings, dents, and scratches from low-hanging tree limbs."

The downside, however, is that a break in the integrity of the FRP coating can allow moisture to seep into the wood core, causing warping and further damage unless repaired quickly.

5. Reparability

If the truck sustains significant sidewall damage to the cargo box in a crash, aluminum is usually less expensive to repair. Only the damaged sidewall panels and posts must be replaced. In the same situation with FRP, the entire sidewall is generally replaced.

For minor damage, such as dents, tears, and scratches, FRP is usually less expensive to repair than aluminum. Aluminum requires replacing the sidewall panel, while damage can be patched and sealed directly with FRP.

6. Interior

FRP offers approximately three inches greater interior space than a comparable aluminum body, which requires side posts and interior lining.

Another factor to consider is interior visibility. "FRP provides a bright white interior in the van body, especially when coupled with a translucent roof," says Besse. "This makes working inside the van body much easier." WT

RATE THIS STORY

Average Rating: 5 out of 5 (1 vote)

COMMENT ON THIS STORY

Please log in to write comment.

New user? Sign up for new membership now!

E-NEWSLETTER

Authoritative & Targeted! We offer e-newsletters that deliver targeted news and information for the entire fleet industry. Subscribe to one or all of them...they're FREE. SUBSCRIBE!

View the latest eNews WEEKLY

ARTICLE ARCHIVE SEARCH

Sponsored Links

Flexible & Powerful Fleet Software
Chevin fleet management software - Where flexibility comes standard. Solutions for all types of vehicle and transport operations. Click Here.

BLOG

Predictions for Fleet in 2009

By Mike Antich
When looking ahead to the next 12 months, I foresee reduced operating costs for fleets offset by increased depreciation expense caused by anemic resale values and decreased incentive monies. Here’s why I believe this will be the case, along with other predictions for 2009.

2008: One of the Worst Years in Fleet History

By Mike Antich
I can’t recall a year as tumultuous as 2008. The year started with the Jan. 1 termination of the $1.8 billion merger between GE and PHH and ended with the near bankruptcy of GM and Chrysler. In between, we witnessed record fuel prices, then a spectacular freefall in fuel prices, a dismal used-vehicle market, unprecedented credit gridlock, the inability of some fleets to order new-vehicles, and fleet delivery disruptions due to a UAW strike and an epic Midwest flood that submerged rail lines.

Fleets Scramble to Cope With Extended Plant Shutdowns

By Mike Antich

Forecast for 2009: A Litany of Uncertainty

By Mike Antich

STORE

$10.00

F&I Magazine - February 2008

In This Issue:
6 Things F&I Managers Need to Stop (Or Start) Doing, Training to Stay in Control, The Ideal Product Mix for 2008 and much more...