The FMCSA said OOIDA's broad ELD exemption request would be too burdensome for roadside...

The FMCSA said OOIDA's broad ELD exemption request would be too burdensome for roadside inspectors.

Photo courtesy CVSA

The Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association’s request for a broad exemption to the ELD mandate for small-business truckers has been denied.

OOIDA, which represents truck drivers and owner-operators, had requested at least a five-year exemption to the rule requiring electronic logging devices to track truck driver hours of service. The exemption was requested for motor carriers classified as small businesses that have a proven safety history.

The request was submitted eight months ago to the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration.  
“We are puzzled and disappointed at the response from the agency,” said Todd Spencer, executive vice president of OOIDA. “For months, the FMCSA has been granting exemptions to other organizations, some not even actually in trucking, but relying on trucks for their businesses.”
The association said in its request that small-business truckers that have already proven their ability to operate safely should not be subject to the rule, asking for an exemption for those defined as small business by the Small Business Administration, with no attributable at-fault crashes, and that do not have a Carrier Safety Rating of “Unsatisfactory.”

Critics of the exemption request said granting it would gut the ELD rule, which went into full effect April 1 with a few exemptions. In joint comments submitted to the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, the Alliance for Driver Safety and Security (aka the Trucking Alliance) and the Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety said OOIDA’s request “would gut the long-settled electronic logging device rule by allowing nearly all trucking companies to delay compliance. The two groups called OOIDA’s request “a transparent attempt to bypass Congress and the courts by regurgitating discredited arguments which seek to advance special interests at the expense of road safety for all motorists.” 

According to OOIDA’s Land Line magazine, the agency cited as a reason for its denial that most of the request challenged the basis of the electronic rule itself and did not recognize the “significant difficulty that would be encountered in trying to identify and validate drivers who meet the proposed exemption criteria, especially during roadside inspections.”

Support for the OOIDA ELD Exemption

In February, more than two dozen Congressmen, in a letter to the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, encouraged the agency to grant OOIDA’s application.

The letter, from Reps. Brian Babin (R-TX) and Steve King (R-IA) and co-signed by another 23 representatives, said they viewed OOIDA’s request as “wholly consistent with the Trump Administration's goal of providing relief from costly and burdensome federal regulations to American small businesses.”

Last month, new legislation brought to the U.S. House of Representatives by congressmen from Montana and Minnesota proposed an exemption from the electronic logging device mandate for small carriers and agricultural haulers.

“Congress is taking notice that the mandate was not ready for prime time,” said Spencer in the release announcing the FMCSA's denial of the request. “There are numerous legislative proposals that would provide relief from the mandate, and we’re hoping Congress moves forward with them.”
Among the numerous concerns cited in the request, the issue of self-certification of vendors is one of the biggest issues brought up by OOIDA. “Most small-business motor carriers can ill afford to make these purchases only to learn later that the ELD is non-compliant.  Yet they are required to do so or risk violation,” said Spencer.
A five-year exemption, it said, would provide necessary time for ELD manufacturers to be fully vetted by the agency, which would alleviate small-business motor carriers from learning that they purchased a device that could damage their vehicles electronic control module or be hacked.

Another Small-Business ELD Exemption Proposal Still Pending

Another group that filed for an exemption around the same time as OOIDA is the Small Business in Transportation Coalition. Its ELD exemption request is still pending and still open for comments at

SBTC says the FMCSA agreed to extend the July 5 deadline by a few days due to technical difficulties with the portal used by the public to file comments electronically. On Twitter, the group criticized OOIDA’s exemption request as a “departure from reality.”

SBTC President James Lamb said its proposal for exemption would be a more manageable one than the rejected OOIDA proposal. It asks for carriers with under 50 employees to be declared exempt. “That should be interpreted as 50 driver employees,” Lamb wrote in an email to members and others.

“This is more manageable and can be tied into MCS-150 data in the FMCSA system rather than make an inspector standing in the rain have to cross-reference multiple data fields in the system to determine if an exemption scenario exists,” he explained. “That is, the FMCSA system can be programmed to flash ‘ELD Exempt’ on the screen so the inspector is told the carrier is exempt rather than have to figure it out on his or her own. And that is simply triggered by the number of drivers in the database as reported in by the carrier on the carrier's last MCS-150.”

Related: Senators Push FMCSA Chief to Reform Trucker Hours of Service Rule

Originally posted on Trucking Info

About the author
Deborah Lockridge

Deborah Lockridge

Editor and Associate Publisher

Reporting on trucking since 1990, Deborah is known for her award-winning magazine editorials and in-depth features on diverse issues, from the driver shortage to maintenance to rapidly changing technology.

View Bio